As trusts translate ICFP insight into action, catering is increasingly being reviewed at trust level rather than school by school. Fragmented delivery models can lead to cost variation, inconsistent provision, and limited financial visibility, making forecasting more difficult.
A more standardised approach can help align cost assumptions, reduce variability in staffing and energy usage, and support consistent compliance across schools. This allows catering to be treated as a more predictable non pay cost within ICFP planning.
Trusts can still retain appropriate local flexibility, while improving financial consistency. For many MATs planning 2026/27 budgets, catering is becoming an area of closer review within wider financial sustainability discussions.

Related Posts
Creating Inclusion Strategies that are built, not just written
A free preparation toolkit to help Trust leaders reflect, engage with context,…


Free AI Tools and Your School’s Data Don’t Mix
Once pupil or staff data is involved, free AI tools carry a real GDPR risk.


Putting People Before Platforms in Digital Strategy
Successful digital change happens when technology is aligned with staff…



